Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thepolyglotdeveloper.com

The Polyglot Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
all1n.dev
All In Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
faridsalomon.com
Farid Salomon | Backend Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
jamesban.com
Jaeyoung Ban | Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
kuzelka.dev
Jan Kuželka - C++ / PHP Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
jameshou.com
James Hou | High School Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
jameshou28.com
James Hou | High School Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
alexanderwang.dev
Alexander Wang | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
kristiannielsen.com
Kristian Nielsen - Frontend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
thelukez.com
LukeZ Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
codeneo.dev
Code:Neo - Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
fatihakdogan.com
Fatih Akdoğan | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
nextleveldeveloper.com
Next Level Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
dobes.dev
Michal Dobeš — web developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
jabreuint.com
Jose Abreu, LAMP/PHP Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
alexdepasquale.dev
Alex De Pasquale | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
andrewxu.tech
Andrew Xu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
abhinavcodes.tech
Abhinav Anand | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
farkie.dev
Farkie – Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.