Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to theojiang.dev

Theo Jiang — Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
billyjf.com
Billy Fisher — Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
labitcode.com
Labitcode — Engineering Lab
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
theprycey.com
PRYCEY — Engineering Tomorrow
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
arnavpal.com
Arnav — ML/AI Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
rndisaac.com
Isaac A — R&D Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
aiengineerhq.org
AI Engineer HQ
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
akro.me
Ahmed — Systems Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
pinchythebot.com
Pinchy 🦀 — AI Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
dkoike.com
Daiki Koike — Engineer & Entrepreneur
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
ronaldma.dev
Ronald — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kshitijtapale.com
Kshitij Tapale — AI Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
robdalida.dev
Rob Dalida — AI Engineer III
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
alexissantos.dev
Alexis Santos — Engineer, Builder, Writer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
ashpathak.dev
Ashutosh Pathak — AI Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
arisvlasakakis.com
Aris Vlasakakis — ML Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
pixari.dev
pixari.dev — Engineering, AI & Leadership
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
sonnetcode.com
Sonnet Code — Engineering teams that ship
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
growthiqo.com
Growthiqo — Engineering the Edge of Growth
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.