Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to theodorecaputi.com

Theodore L. Caputi — Economist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
fatih.ai
Fatih Kansoy — Economist, University of Oxford
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
aboutphiliphbrown.net
Philip H Brown Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
socialisteconomist.com
Socialist Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
thenomadeconomist.com
The Nomad Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
matisimm.com
Mati Simm — Economic Ethics, Theology, Writing & Talks
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
maxbnorton.com
Max B. Norton | Economist | Senior Associate, CRA
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
maxnorton.com
Max B. Norton | Economist | Senior Associate, CRA
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
internetdatasources.com
Be Your Own Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
theredneckeconomist.com
rneconomist.com
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
cloud-economics.com
Cloud(y) Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
cnvive.com
China Economic News - CnVive
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
bluecrestinstitute.com
Bluecrest — Economic Policy Research & Consultancy | Somalia
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
mathanics.com
Mathanics — Economic transmission simulator
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
academicajournal.org
JEAC : Journal of Economic Academic
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
robinlenoir.com
Robin Lenoir - Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
soleconomics.com
SOL2 ECONOMICS
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
intervisteinterviste.com
Christian Carmine Pedocchi — Reputation Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
intervistesulweboggi.com
Christian Carmine Pedocchi — Reputation Economics
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.