Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to theobhering.com

Theo Bhering • Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
alexcali.me
Alex Cali | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
bobbyquilacio.com
Bobby Quilacio | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
romko.dev
Roman Kornig | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
arpitsachdeva.com
Arpit Sachdeva | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
felipewom.dev
Felipe Moura — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
divyanshusoni.com
Divyanshu Soni | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
pierres.dev
Pierre Smith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
codecret.com
Mohamad | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
dminhvu.com
Minh Vu — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
romitsagu.com
Romit Sagu | Software Engineering
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abhinavranjith.dev
Abhinav Ranjith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ahmedyassin.dev
Ahmed Yassin | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
alexswensen.io
Alexander Swensen | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
angusblomley.com
Angus Blomley - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
anirudhchintha.dev
Anirudh Chintha - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rohangore.com
Rohan Gore - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
kylekerlew.com
Kyle Kerlew | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andrewbadams.com
Andrew Adams | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.