Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thenewpub.com

Public Legal Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
pit-law.de 🇩🇪
Pitc Legal |
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
70match
pit-legal.de 🇩🇪
Pitc Legal |
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
70match
pitc-law.de 🇩🇪
Pitc Legal |
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
70match
pitc-legal.de 🇩🇪
Pitc Legal |
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
67match
smartlegalmarket.com
Smart Legal Market
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
67match
smartlegalmarket24.com
Smart Legal Market
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
66match
theoroslegal.com
Theoros Legal
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
66match
bluelakelegal.com
Blue Lake Legal Ltd.
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
66match
dobslaw.com
Dobslaw Legal Servies
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
66match
pr-plus-recht.de 🇩🇪
Public Relations & Recht
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
66match
pwc-legal.de 🇩🇪
Startseite - PwC Legal
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
66match
pwclegal.de 🇩🇪
Startseite - PwC Legal
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
66match
opensourcerecht.de 🇩🇪
RightNow Legal Services
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
66match
peters-legal.com
KANZLEI | PETERS Legal
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
65match
paulus-legal.de 🇩🇪
Paulus legal - Ihr Anwalt - Paulus legal
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
65match
peterer-legal.com
PETERER Rechtsanwälte Notare AG - Peterer Legal
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
65match
r-legal.de 🇩🇪
Home - Rozovskaya Legal
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry
64match
arthur-levi.com
Arthur Levi & Partner | Legal Intelligence Advisory
2 shared topicslegal-services-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.