Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to theneum.com

Theneum · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
acko.net
Hackery, Math & Design — Acko.net
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
63match
ad0rt.net
Home | Grav
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alexisdiamond.net
Home | Grav
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
9ion.com
Home | Grav
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
arsayyapi.com
Home | Grav
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
guided-pathway.com
Home | Grav
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
romckernan.com
Home | Grav
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
solar-ui.com
Solar UI — Components built to look great together – SolarUI
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
angularcharts.com
Angular Charts Examples & Samples Demo shadcn inspired
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
arthurpesco.com
Home | Arthur Pesco
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
griffinwebworks.com
Chris Griffin /// Design Systems Architect & Design Technologist
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
intermachina.com
Astro Modular
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
felixjamestin.com
Felix Jamestin's blog
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
rogin.dev
Rogin Farrer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
themecot.com
ThemeCot - WordPress Themes, Plugins and Resources
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
themesplan.com
Home - ThemesPlan
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
abbeyhastings.com
Abbey Hastings — Product | Content
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
62match
arihantcodes.com
Arihant Jain | Design Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.