Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to themarkappleby.com

Mark Appleby — Web Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
86match
alexwd.me
Alex Allen - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
85match
2ipper.com
2ipper — Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
85match
ksimo.com
Simonas Karalius | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
85match
romelamin.com
Romel Amin — App Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
83match
anotherdeveloperblog.dev
Another Developer Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
benz.dev
Andrej Benz - Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
cm-web.dev
CM Web Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
internetsayfasi.com
The CodeGrammer - Best Web & Application developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
adys.dev
Adys - Bitcoin Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
arunraj.dev
ARUN | Developer Profile
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
dominicheal.com
Dominic Heal - Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
bnhsoftware.dev
Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
arinmauk.com
Arin Mauk - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
felipe-bravo.com
Felipe Bravo – Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
pieterlinde.com
Pieter Linde – Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
artisann.dev
Artisann | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
mcarthey.com
Home - GEN-X DEVELOPER TERMINAL
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
adamkent.net
Adam Kent - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.