Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thelondoncoder.com

The London Coder · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
thelostcoder.com
The Lost Coder
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
doctorsourcecode.com
Dr. Source Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
8mincode.com
8 min code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andywhittle.dev
Andy Whittle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
dlistcoders.com
D-List Coders
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
rodrigocoincurvo.com
Rodrigo Coin Curvo | Software Developer Educator
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
maycontaincode.com
May Contain Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
pistolinkr.com
The Pistolinkr Code Museum
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
bluehood.dev
home | codekobold.io
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
aesthetecoding.io
Aesthete coding, Easy to code, hard to master
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
mathcoder.app
MathCoder
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
thejrdev.com
The Jr Dev - Crushing Code One Bug at a Time
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewmarkle.com
Andrew Markle · Andrew Markle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
abenezer.org
Abenezer Belachew / Software Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
armannvg.com
armannvg
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewtheguy.com
Andrew Chen — passionate coder, classical music lover, special food maker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewtatham.com
Andrew Tatham
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andrewls.net
AndrewLS — Software Engineer | C++, Flutter & Python
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.