Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thelike.app

LIKE - Sports Player Analytics · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
ben-jacobson.com
Ben Jacobson | Sports Analytics
2 shared topicsbasketball
71match
thestatlas.com
STATLAS — NBA Analytics Platform
2 shared topicsbasketball
70match
fatimahjandaengas.com
PropVision | NBA Player Props Analytics
2 shared topicsbasketball
69match
acesportspreviews.com
Ace Sports Previews
2 shared topicssports
68match
2bobsports.com
2bob Sports - Sports Unfiltered
2 shared topicssports
68match
andybsports.com
Andy B Sports | Sports and More
2 shared topicsbasketball
68match
5blind.app
Five Blind - Sports Ranking Game
2 shared topicssports
68match
bncesports.com
BNCE Sports
2 shared topicsbasketball
67match
5lab.tech
5Lab | Basketball Tailored Analytics
2 shared topicsbasketball
67match
7throwsports.com
7th Row Sports
2 shared topicssports
67match
fb-ninja.com
NBA Fantasy Basketball Analytics — Rankings, Projections & Player Props | FanScout
2 shared topicssports
66match
1stplacesportscomplex.com
1st Place Sports Complex
2 shared topicsbasketball
66match
bmssportsagency.com
BMS SPORTS AGENCY
2 shared topicsbasketball
66match
nevdexsportslab.com
NevDex Sports Lab
2 shared topicsbasketball
66match
rockfordgreenhouses.com
Home - Greg Grant Sportsplex
2 shared topicsbasketball
66match
bobbigelow.com
Improving Youth Sports - Bob Bigelow - Youth Sports Survey
2 shared topicssports
66match
3dbasketballprep.com
3D Sports Prep | 3D Basketball Prep
2 shared topicsbasketball
65match
thenailpodcast.com
the nail in the coffin | A Cleveland sports podcast
2 shared topicssports

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.