Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thedevroots.com

Welcome to Dev Roots · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
recalarm.com
Welcome to Python.org
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
js2brain.com
Welcome to JS 2 brain!
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
silentbyte.dev
Welcome to Silent Byte
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
aavalam.org
Welcome to AAVALAM.org!
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
mstantchev.com
Welcome
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
campug.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome to CamPUG | campug.github.io
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
cppbytes.com
Welcome - C++ Bytes
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
owenrudge.com
owenrudge.net - Welcome to owenrudge.net
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
fromfogtolighthouse.com
Welcome - fromFogtoLighthouse
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
lossofgenerality.com
Welcome to CCN Studios | Free Form Programming Language
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
crazydevworld.com
Home - Crazy Dev World
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
lorentzvedeler.com
Lorentz Dev Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
0xghost.dev
0xGhost // System Root
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mradionov.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
abdel.me
Home | Abdel
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
buildclicourse.com
Build Command-Line Tools Developers Love
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
furoland.com
Furo Land Dev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
jullianmercier.com
Home | Swift
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.