Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thebugcount.com

The Bug Count – A Vancouver science blog · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
kidssciencemagazine.com
HOME - KIDS SCIENCE MAGAZINE
1 shared topicsscience
68match
arsic.org
Art Researches Science - Home
1 shared topicsscience
68match
kinesismagazine.com
Kinesis Magazine – UCL's Best Science Magazine
1 shared topicsscience
68match
sionscience.com
Si On Science - Book Reviews
1 shared topicsscience
68match
sistalkscience.com
SIS TALKS SCIENCE
1 shared topicsscience
68match
the-blink-lab.com
I Dream of GINI – Data Science, Art, Society
1 shared topicsscience
68match
descienced.com
Descienced
1 shared topicsscience
67match
annalsofappliedsciences.com
Annals of Applied Sciences
1 shared topicsscience
67match
anatomyofscience.com
SciNet – The Anatomy of Science
1 shared topicsscience
67match
betterscience.com
Home - Better Science
1 shared topicsscience
67match
anirudhsharma.me
Anirudh Sharma - Science | Technology | Nature
1 shared topicsscience
67match
avantesciences.org
Avante Science
1 shared topicsscience
67match
desciencemodel.com
de science model
1 shared topicsscience
67match
andymurdock.com
Andy Murdock – Science Communications & Content Strategy
1 shared topicsscience
67match
anadefaria.com
Ana de Faria – Transforming Complex Science into Compelling Stories.
1 shared topicsscience
67match
sixdayscience.com
SixDay Science | Faith in Science | Science in Faith
1 shared topicsscience
67match
amyewest.com
Amy E. West – MARINE SCIENTIST, SCIENCE WRITER AND MULTIMEDIA CREATOR
1 shared topicsscience
67match
andesfenix.com
AndesFenix — Where Breakthrough Science Becomes Market Reality
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.