Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thebencox.com

Software Developer | Ben Cox · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
juanlozada.com
Juan Lozada - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
alamdev.tech
Alam | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
justinhdev.com
Justin Hancock | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
lourencohenri.com
HLDEV | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kaanses.com
Kaan Ses - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abmdev.net
ABMdev | Software Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
pacoguerraq.com
pacoguerraq | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
einjeong.com
Ein Jeong | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
jurosh.com
Jurosh Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abruce.me
Alex Bruce — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
eddie-ezekiel.com
Software Developer in Kenya
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andrewgordon.dev
Andrew Gordon | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
bruceniyibitanga.com
Bruce Niyibitanga | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
moxtechdevelopers.com
MOXTECH Software Developers
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
muhammedsafi.com
Muhammed Safi — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
brucestull.com
Bruce Stull — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
julianvoros.com
Julian Voros | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
jwsmithdev.com
Jordan Smith - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.