Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to theagilecodes.com

Agile Codes | Premium Software Engineering · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
holedev.com
holedev - Software Engineering
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
andymbridges.com
Andy Bridges | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
juandk.com
Juan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andybangs.dev
Andy Bangs | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
abroro.com
abroro - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
jsteagle.dev
Justus - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
mrcelino.dev
Marcel | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
luiray.com
Ray Lui | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
lugora.com
AboutMe | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andrewbadams.com
Andrew Adams | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
alexiwisteria.dev
Alex Lee | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
lukescoates.com
Full-Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
alexcali.me
Alex Cali | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
alexanderpang.net
Alex Pang - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andyhume.net
Andy Hume - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ataekren.com
Ata Ekren - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
dadiengalfred.com
Alfred | Product-Led Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
ed-li.com
Edward Li - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.