Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to tgreenidge.com

Portfolio - Tisha Greenidge · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
evelynanais.com
Evelyn - Full Stack Software Engineer | Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
70match
anitabangali.com
Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
69match
anibalalpizar.com
Aníbal Alpizar's portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
simonrosset.com
Simon Rosset - Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
a-mkemp.com
A-M Kemp Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ann-mariekemp.com
A-M Kemp Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
68match
andy-vu.com
Andy Vu | Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
naspo.dev
Naspo Dev Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
amitmehta.dev
Amit Mehta Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
manjunathgajula.com
Manjunath Gajula | Senior Java Developer Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
simplyaam.com
SimplyAam - Mohammad Adeel | Portfolio & Learning Journal
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andrewlethbridge.com
Andrew Lethbridge's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
ethanmossdev.com
Ethan Moss - Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
arielgoldring.dev
Ariel Goldring | Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
arshpreetsinghcse.com
Arshpreet Singh Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
abuffseagull.dev
ABuffSeagull's Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
naman-anand.com
Naman Anand | Senior Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
natalieaponte.com
Natalie Aponte Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.