Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to tgratzer.com

Taylor Gratzer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
actuallytaylor.com
Taylor Lineman
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewreed.org
How to Improve an NFA Constructed Lexical Analyzer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alejandrolaguna.dev
Alejandro Laguna
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alexandergraham.dev
Alexander Graham
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abu-ahmad.com
Motasem AbuAhmad
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
egorikas.com
Egor Grishechko's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
astrocache.io
Astrocache
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
reidme.dev
REIDME
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
buildsoftwaresystems.com
Build Software Systems
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
theari.dev
Ari Seyhun
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
multitasq.com
Justin McCandless · Justin McCandless
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
sijanrijal.dev
Sijan Rijal
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
luisciber.com
Sci Math && Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
a-nickels-worth.dev
A Nickel's Worth
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
cravencode.com
CravenCode
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
lpaneque.com
Paneque's Technology Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
lueders.io
Add, Subtract, or Die! | Christoph Lüders
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
buddywilliams.dev
Buddy Williams - Projects and Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.