Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to tfemily.com

Emily's TG/TF Fiction · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
lpfiction.com
LPfiction - Home
1 shared topicsfiction
68match
hodgepodgeaudio.com
Hodgepodge Audio Fiction
1 shared topicsfiction
68match
absurdistfiction.com
Absurdist Fiction
1 shared topicsfiction
67match
btranwrites.com
bt tran – gay speculative fiction
1 shared topicsfiction
66match
efapodcast.com
Earp Fiction Addiction Podcast
1 shared topicsfiction
66match
funtaledo.com
Home | Read Fiction Online
1 shared topicsfiction
66match
atomiccarnivalbooks.com
Atomic Carnival Books – Weird Fiction for Weirdos
1 shared topicsfiction
66match
funsizedfiction.com
Fun Sized Fiction | Kai MFS | Substack
1 shared topicsfiction
66match
bunnycates.com
Bunny Cates | Author of Dark, Emotionally Driven Fiction
1 shared topicsfiction
66match
tgtavern.com
TG Tavern | TG Captions & Videos
1 shared topicsfiction
65match
sierraslade.com
Sierra Slade – Fiction Author
1 shared topicsfiction
65match
cowtexas.com
🗞️ THE COW TEXAS TIMES — Real news. Fictional town.
1 shared topicsfiction
65match
chapterly.org
Chapterly Stories | Emotionally Rich Fiction
1 shared topicsfiction
65match
chapterlystories.com
Chapterly Stories | Emotionally Rich Fiction
1 shared topicsfiction
65match
ozziemgartrell.com
Ozzie M Gartrell | Speculative Fiction Author
1 shared topicsfiction
65match
asyouwrite.com
As You Write - write interactive fiction the easy way
1 shared topicsfiction
65match
kacotropo.com
Kaco Tropo | A collection of Flash Fiction stories
1 shared topicsfiction
65match
brandonrluffman.com
Brandon R. Luffman | Author of supernatural horror and other fiction
1 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.