similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to textilegateway.com

Textile Gateway · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

The Twelve Gates

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

texturepoetics.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

KitabuBase - Universal Gateway to Books & Learning | Free Digital Library

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anne-gardner.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

textualplay.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

textbookmaniac.com

Textbook Maniac

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

tettegattini.com

Tette e Gattini ~ E-Book di Matteo Flora

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

TEXT-URES - Home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arrowgatepublishing.com

ARROW GATE PUBLISHING - HOME OF QUALITY BOOKS

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

annabellegurwitch.com

Annabelle Gurwitch

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

gmjcowley | A rolling stone gathers no moss

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

patricialeegauch.com

Patricia Lee Gauch

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

theagreeablegoat.com

The Agreeable Goat — Books and Gatherings

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

textualorientation.com

Textual Orientation

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.