Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to teskeygroup.com

Teskey Group | TU Braunschweig · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
dewanjiresearch.com
Dewanji Group | Organic Synthesis & Catalysis
1 shared topicschemistry
66match
andrearobinsongroup.com
Andrea Robinson Group | Chemistry at Monash University
1 shared topicschemistry
66match
skplabiitkgp.com
SKP Research Group
1 shared topicschemistry
66match
cheukwaiso.com
Main Group Chemistry | Cheuk Wai So @ NTU Singapore
1 shared topicschemistry
66match
gloverresearchgroup.com
Glover Research Group - Home
1 shared topicschemistry
66match
nanyanggroupid.com
Nanyang Group
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
chemicogroup.com
Chemico group
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
maimonelab.com
Maimone Lab|Tom Maimone|Maimone Group|UC Berkeley
1 shared topicschemistry
65match
mankadgroup.com
Mankad Group @ UIC
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
albrechtresearch.com
Albrecht Research Group
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
chemcatgroup.com
Group Of Effective Catalysis | ChemCatGroup | Denis Chusov
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
kfenglab.com
Feng Group
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
impact-g.com
Impact Group | Turning Exhaust Gas into Resources via Plasma Technology | Hokkaido University
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
sino-shengyuan.com
Changzhou Crown Ethers Group Co.,Ltd
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
grigroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
Gri Group – Gri Group
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
glocotgroup.com
Building a Sustainable Future | Glocot Group
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
glocotsilicone.com
Building a Sustainable Future | Glocot Group
1 shared topicschemistry
64match
the-ye-group.com
The Ye Group – 主页 -
1 shared topicschemistry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.