Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to terribleminds.com

Chuck Wendig: Terribleminds – Apple-Obsessed Author Fella · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
judithcrowauthor.com
Judith Crow – Caithness based author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
pamelamosesbooks.com
Pamela Moses – Author Website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
gabrielagonzales.com
Gabriela Gonzales – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
juliaboon.com
Julia Boon – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
louisemarburg.com
Louise Marburg – author website
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
ashlenbrown.com
Ashlen Brown – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
corytoscano.com
Cory Toscano – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
jrludwig.com
J. R. Ludwig – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
tg-sparks.com
T.G. Sparks – Author and playwright
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
louellastone.com
Lou Ella Stone – Author extraordinaire
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
loustardust.com
Lou Ella Stone – Author extraordinaire
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
singingmagpies.com
Michael Pattarozzi – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
terrinolan.com
Terri Nolan – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
lorettapolaski.com
Loretta Polaski – Author of Suspense
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
angienordstromauthor.com
Angie Nordstrom – Angie's author website
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
lucciagray.com
Rereading Jane Eyre – Author Luccia Gray
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
corrinedalton.com
Corrine Dalton – Indie Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
reggievrudd.com
Reggie V. Rudd author page
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.