Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to terrasnover.com

Terra Snover — Game Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
alexscrivner.com
Alex Scrivner — Game Designer & Artist
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
jungfell.com
Lucas Fellner — Game Designer & Researcher
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
reedaraymond.com
Reed Raymond — Game Designer & Writer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
judhalpin.com
Jud Halpin / Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
mediasamurai.co.uk 🇬🇧
Aysheq Hussain — Game Developer & Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
owenbassdesign.com
Owen Bass – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
andrewstewartgames.com
Andrew Stewart – Game Designer –
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
andreypvelkov.com
Andrey Velkov — Lead Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
reidflamm.com
Reid Somers Flamm — Game Designer & Producer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
julianstables.com
Julian Stables Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
eerrard.com
Emmanuel Errard – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
thalesrebelo.com
Thales Rebelo - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
bwgamedesign.com
Bryce Williams | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
calebwharton.com
Caleb Wharton – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
burakkurkcu.com
Burak Kürkçü | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
simonhalliday.com
Simon Halliday – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
juliuskrueger.com
Julius Krüger – Technical Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.