similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to terimbrown.com

Teri M Brown, Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

ashlenbrown.com

Ashlen Brown – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

alexhmpreston.com

Alex Preston, author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andieyoungwrites.com

Andie Young, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

paulgreenauthor.com

Paul Green, Author

2 shared topicsfiction

kimbeattyauthor.com

Kim Beatty, Author

2 shared topicsfiction

2 shared topicsfiction

derenhansen.com

Deren Hansen, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

eviejacobsauthor.com

Evie Jacobs, Author

2 shared topicsfiction

kimpetersauthor.com

Kim Peters, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

malcolmdavidlogan.com

Malcolm David Logan, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Home of CHARLI POE, author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Home | D. Emery Bunn, Author

2 shared topicsfiction

kikihamilton.com

Kiki Hamilton, Author

2 shared topicsfiction

pbrooksauthor.com

P Brooks Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

S.J. Pesut, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Cheri Baker - Author

2 shared topicsfiction

ilenewdevlin.com

Ilene W. Devlin, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

kimimasauthor.com

Kim Imas, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.