Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to teresaphan.com

Teresa Phan - Senior Interaction Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
andreparr.com
André Parr | Interaction Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
ethanligondesign.com
digital accessibility and interaction design
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
imoberdorf.io
Selim Imoberdorf • Interaction Designer based in Switzerland
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
designcouch.com
Jesse Couch - Senior UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
andrzejradziejowski.com
Interaction Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
amrfakhri.com
Amr Fakhri — Senior UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
andrecesarini.com
André Cesarini - Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
paulinawasik.com
Paulina Wasik - Senior Digital Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
betdivirgilio.com
Bettina Di Virgilio :: Italian Designer :: Product and Interaction
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
abigailandersondesign.com
Abigail Anderson Designs - Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
patlopes.com
Patrick Lopes · Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
ikerortega.com
Home - Iker Ortega - Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
imlxb.com
User Experience / User Interface Designer - Michael Balsat
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
nategreaves.com
Nathan Greaves — Senior UX & Graphic Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
godwinbirve.com
Godwin Birve — Senior UI/UX & Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
ilyapolyak.com
Ilya Polyak | Senior Product designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
designerjasveer.com
Jasveer Kaur — Senior UI/UX & Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
renukalakra.com
Renuka Lakra — Senior UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.