Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to teravele.dev

Portfolio - TE Ravele · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
0xoffsec.com
Portfolio App
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
gmorubio.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
denistita.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
gmeran.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
nasimhossain.com
Nasim - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
adhrin.dev
Adhrin - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
devj2k.com
DevJ2K - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
khartka.com
Klaudia's portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
3urobeat.com
3urobeat - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
singhapps.com
• Atul | PORTFOLIO
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
a4r.dev
Bea Archer - Portfolio Site
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
chinedujoey.com
Chinedu Joey Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
rentionsoftware.com
Rention - App Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
narea.dev
Wilson Narea | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
albertdalmau.dev
Albert Dalmau Bravo - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
aghyad.dev
Aghyad – Apps Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
abalimustafa.com
Mustafa Abali | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
ikamlesh.com
Kamlesh Patel | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.