Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to temples.com

Phil Temples – Writer & Photographer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
caitdarfler.com
Cait Darfler – writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
shatiwrites.com
S. Hati – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
susanmailer.com
Susan Mailer – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
lyndsiemanusos.com
Lyndsie Manusos – Writer & Bookseller
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
genevieverheams.com
Genevieve Rheams – Writer & Storyteller
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
angiemichaelis.com
Angie Michaelis – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
geoffreyfoley.com
Geoff Foley – writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ivanbaidak.com
Ivan Baidak – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
lydiasyson.com
Lydia Syson – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ishmaelgrey.com
Ishmael Grey – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
gemmabrookwriter.com
Gemma L. Brook – Writer & Word Explorer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
susanjoneswriter.com
Susan Jones – Writer – My Writing Blog
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
angelajameson.com
Angela Jameson – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
ivorymacintyre.com
ivory macintyre – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
andymozina.com
Andy Mozina – Writer * Teacher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
geekstl.com
Wayne Cole – Writer Podcaster Geek
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
itsindiea.com
Indie A – Writing
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
angelajdawson.com
Angela J Dawson – Writer – Author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.