Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ted4andover.com

Ted Butler for Andover City Council · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
connerforcouncil.com
Debbie Conner for City Council
2 shared topicselections
72match
callahanhv.com
Callahan for City Council
2 shared topicselections
72match
estuardo4la.com
Estuardo for City Council
2 shared topicselections
71match
dion4hercules.com
Dion Bailey for City Council
2 shared topicselections
71match
hewittwilldoit.com
Alison Hewitt for City Council
2 shared topicselections
71match
hewittfortampa.com
Alison Hewitt for City Council
2 shared topicselections
71match
shelden4vt.com
Shelden for EJ City Council
2 shared topicselections
71match
sheldon4vt.com
Shelden for EJ City Council
2 shared topicselections
70match
richforsedona.com
Rich Gay for Sedona City Council
2 shared topicspolitics
69match
moellerfororange.com
Brendon Moeller for Orange City Council, District 6
2 shared topicselections
69match
essexforolathe.com
Robyn Essex | for Olathe City Council
2 shared topicselections
69match
andypierucci.com
Andy Pierucci for Riverton City Council
2 shared topicselections
69match
henry-lo.com
Henry Lo for Monterey Park City Council
2 shared topicselections
69match
shearer4obcouncil.com
Shearer for OB Council
2 shared topicselections
69match
cacciatore4urbandale.com
Joe Cacciatore for Urbandale City Council
2 shared topicselections
68match
andreasamson.com
Re-Elect Andrea Samson for Loveland City Council
2 shared topicselections
68match
ethanforeugene.com
Ethan for Eugene | Ward 1 Candidate for City Council
2 shared topicselections
68match
macmichaelforcouncil.com
Home - Brad MacMichael for Geneva City Council
2 shared topicselections

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.