Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to techpedia.it

HOME · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
61match
androiddevs.it 🇮🇹
ADI | Android Developers Italia
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
appturbo.it 🇮🇹
Mobile App Development - App Turbo
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
aclegg2011.com
Aclegg2011, Android Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
andrewtpagan.com
Andrew Pagan
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
b612manager.com
B612 Studio Manager
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
aristoneventi.com
Accesso - Tool Eventi
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
ssree.dev
Sreehari Sreedev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
stefanopietrosanti.com
Stefano Pietrosanti, PhD MSc
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
appleshare.it 🇮🇹
AppleShare IT
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
55match
azioneinformatica.net
Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
55match
intosend.com
Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
55match
appsiti.it 🇮🇹
home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
55match
appink.it 🇮🇹
Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
40match
andreabertoloni.it 🇮🇹
Andrea Bertoloni
2 shared topicsweb-development
40match
bisc8.app
BISC8: GDPR cookie consent for solo-builders
2 shared topicsweb-development
40match
alessiocabianca.net
Alessio Cabianca — Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
40match
androidpeople.it 🇮🇹
AndroidPeople News Android – tutto quello che avresti sempre voluto sapere su Android
2 shared topicssmartphones
40match
andreascanzani.it 🇮🇹
Andrea Scanzani - IT Architect and Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.