similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to systemsecurityengr.com

Systemsecurityengr alternatives & similar sites

THE SYSTEMS SECURITY ENGINEERING GROUP - Home — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jmpsec.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	JMP Sec \| Security Engineering Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnsoudi.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	aspiring security engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
salmanwz.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Salman Wajid - Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abnerpallichan.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Abner Pallichan \| Security Systems Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
suryaviyyapu.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Surya Viyyapu \| Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joeadamsphilly.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Joe Adams \| Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johandevsec.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Johan Camacho \| Systems Engineer & Cybersecurity Specialist	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
useqastenai.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Senior Engineering & Security Consultants	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
useqasten.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Senior Engineering & Security Consultants	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcic-group.co.uk ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcicgroup.uk ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcicgroup.co.uk ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcic-group.uk ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xsha.io ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	0xSHA · Security Research & Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avogiatzoglou.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Angeliki Vogiatzoglou \| Security Engineer	NL~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cybervehicle.autos ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Vehicle — Automotive Cybersecurity Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aysarlabs.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Aysar Bisanal — IT Security Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hatshelf.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Backend Security Engineering in Depth	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.