similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to system44.com

System44 alternatives & similar sites

System 44 | 3–12 Reading Intervention | HMH — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Special Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
usareadingclinic.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	USA Reading Clinic	en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3dlearning.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HOME \| 3d Reading and Learning Online Tutoring K-12	en	special-education Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abilitybasedlearning.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ability Based Learning, home to Scaredy Cat Reading System	en	special-education Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
customeducationfoundation.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Custom Education Foundation \| Creating a Path for Individuals with Autism	en	special-education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academicalliesla.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Academic Allies LA \| Educational therapy consultant and K-12 reading specialist	en	special-education Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
capabilitybuilding.org.au ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Capability Building Incorporated	AU en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessiblereadingnj.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Abilities \| Self-Confidence \| Accessible Reading LLC	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nalandalearningsolutions.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Nalanda Learning Solutions - Innovative Education & Learning Center	IN~ en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aweneducation.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Awen Education \| consultancy	en	special-education Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bcsbc.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Butler County Special Education Interlocal - Home	en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allkidscan.com.au ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	All Kids Can Education \| Literacy & Dyslexia Tutoring	AU en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3dtutoring.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	K-12 Tutoring in Cleveland, Ohio \| 3D Tutoring	US~ en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
barrycarpentereducation.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Barry Carpenter Education – International Educational Consultant	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
surgehk.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Surge HK \| Special Education & Learning Support Hong Kong	en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
happymindtraining.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Happy Mind Training – Embracing Inclusive Education	en	special-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aadcorp.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AAD Corp \| Building Inclusive Learning Communities for All	en	special-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5sensactivities.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NCCAP Certification \| 5 SensActivities	en	special-education Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cdacompany.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Cognitive Diagnostic Associates - Special Education Services	en	special-education WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.