Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to swordwater.com

Daniel J. Rothery – Author Site · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
88match
calebguice.com
calebguice.com – Author Site
2 shared topicsfiction
83match
henrycoles.com
Henry Coles | author site
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
81match
heididaniele.com
HEIDI DANIELE – AUTHOR
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
79match
lyfaulk.com
Ly Faulk – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
79match
angelasweeney.com
Angela Sweeney – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
79match
anneboothauthor.com
Anne Booth – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
79match
camillashelley.com
Camilla Shelley – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
79match
helengoltz.com
Helen Goltz – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
78match
gbgillean.com
G.B. Gillean – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
78match
maciecraven.com
Macie Craven – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
78match
esbarrison-author.com
E.S. Barrison – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
78match
iveeolivares.com
Ivee Olivares – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
78match
anthonysegarrabooks.com
Anthony Segarra – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
78match
caitlynsurkein.com
Caitlyn Surkein – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
78match
anitahalvorssen.com
Anita Halvorssen – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
77match
hectormillerbooks.com
Hector Miller Books – Author page
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
annbakshisauthor.com
Ann Bakshis – Author – Indie Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
monicazepeda.com
Monica Zepeda – Author & Screenwriter
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.