Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to swordfish-security.com

Swordfish Security · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
itmsecurity.net
ITM Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
octopisecurity.com
Octopi Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
isidefensemsp.com
ISI Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
isidefense.com
ISI Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
isidefense-msp.com
ISI Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
isidefense-connect.com
ISI Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
seaxsecurity.co.uk 🇬🇧
Seax Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
heqa-sec.com
HEQA Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
revesec.com
Reve Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
kondasecurity.com
Konda Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
3qsecurity.com
3Q Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
3qsecurity.io
3Q Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
bdpsecurity.com
BDP Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
pocsec.com
POC Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
ns-security.co.uk 🇬🇧
NS Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
keepingdatasecure.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cyber Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
camasecurity.com
CAMA Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
shiftsecurityapp.com
Shift Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.