Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to swiftpress.com

Welcome | Swift Press · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
swamppress.com
Swamp Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
obsolete-press.com
Obsolete Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
shenwrite.com
Welcome Home - ShenWrite
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
hqstories.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome to HQ - books that are bold, brave and inclusive
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
etheridgepress.com
Etheridge Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
resilience-the-book.com
Home - Mountainside MD Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
andrewbert.com
Welcome to AndrewBurt.com
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
andrewburt.com
Welcome to AndrewBurt.com
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
caendoria.com
Imagination Ether Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
moonshinereview.com
Moonshine Review Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
moonshinereviewpress.com
Moonshine Review Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
diversebookhouse.com
Inclusive Wellness Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
rhubarbpress.com
RhubarbPress.com - Independent Publishing House
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
ancyrayayinlari.com
Ancyra Press
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
revealhousepress.com
Home Page
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
gatchobooks.com
HOME | GatchoBooks
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
beckythebookcoach.com
Home | Becky the Book Coach
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
bastchat.com
Welcome to BaastBook - BaastBook.com
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.