Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to swentures.com

swentures — Sebastian Weiss · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
isoftventures.com
iSoft Ventures — Build. Serve. Invest.
2 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
itventures.com
It Ventures — Venture Intelligence | ItVentures.com
2 shared topicsventure-capital
68match
shastaventures.com
Shasta Ventures
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
anansiventures.com
Anansi Ventures — A trusted bridge across the African Diaspora
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
calventures.com
Cal Ventures — Venture Intelligence | CalVentures.com
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
playgroupventures.com
playgroup.ventures — a venture studio
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
madventures.com
Mad Ventures 1
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
caelixventures.com
Caelix Ventures — Frontier Venture Platform
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
caelix.ai
Caelix Ventures — Frontier Venture Platform
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
baysideventures.com
Baysi Dev Entures — Venture Intelligence | BaysiDevEntures.com
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
obsidianheron.com
Obsidian Heron — Venture Studio
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
shilp.com
Shilp — Turning Ideas Into Ventures
2 shared topicsventure-capital
67match
reventurehq.com
ReVenture Labs
2 shared topicsstartups
66match
eti-ventures.com
Eti Ventures
2 shared topicsventure-capital
66match
0ventures.com
0 Ventures
2 shared topicsstartups
66match
istoriaventures.com
Istoria Ventures
2 shared topicsventure-capital
66match
conkerventures.com
Conker Ventures
2 shared topicsstartups
66match
hecvibe.com
HEC VIBE — Ventures • Innovation • Business • Entrepreneurship
2 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.