Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to swaldmann.com

Steffen Waldmann · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
henrybao.dev
Henry Bao
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
mohitbhatia.com
Mohit Bhatia
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
molterer.dev
Max Molterer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
maartengrootendorst.com
Maarten Grootendorst
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
ganeshsadasivan.com
Ganesh Sadasivan
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
pleasework.app
Please Work
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
iuliamidus.com
Iulia Midus
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
riccardorodella.com
Riccardo Rodella
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
rickanli.dev
Rickan Li - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
calumgathergood.com
Calum Gathergood
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
cameronshemilt.com
Cameron Shemilt
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
madalitsosimbeye.com
Madalitso Simbeye | Software Engineer & Startup Founder
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
shomiapps.com
Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
kojooma.com
kojooma.github.io | kojooma
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
rexygen.com
Programming devices without hand coding - REXYGEN
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
anmolmoses.com
Anmol Moses — Apps, Essays, Experiments
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
dnatips.com
Polyticks
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
heyimhelen.com
Helen Highwater | Fullstack Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.