Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to svenalexdev.com

svenalexdev – Personal test website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
shehramdev.com
Shehram Dev – Personal Portfolio Website
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
bavnhoej.com
Christian Bavnhøj – Personal website
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
moshanyu.com
MSY's Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
moedevco.com
MoDev – Optimizing Websites
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
rhysleppan.com
Modern Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
mohitya.dev
Mohit - Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
3bdullelah.com
my test website
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
susiehu.com
Susie Hu Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
nuzulh.com
Nuzul H. - Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
sherilu.com
Sheri Lu | Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
madanraj.com
Madan Raj - Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
70match
madan-raj.com
Madan Raj - Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
bddtestlab.com
BDD Test Lab – Website Testing Lab
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
rezanmohammad.com
Rezan Mohammad Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
rezaadineh.com
ReZaAdineH – reza adineh Personal web
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
synestero.com
Personal Portfolio Website
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
andriycherednikov.com
personal-website
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
69match
shao-zhen.com
Shao-Zhen Hong | Personal Website
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.