Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to svanjons.com

Svanjons Publication · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
2ndcannons.com
2nd Cannons Publications
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
etc-publications.com
etc. publications
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
shivampublication.com
Shivam Publication
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
sunrise-publications.com
Sunrise Publications
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
anantjitpublication.com
ANANTJIT Publications
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
kpmaindia.com
KPMA Business Publications
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
antimpublication.com
Home - Antim Publication
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
gayatribooks.com
Publication | Gayatri Books
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
shbookpub.com
HOME - STACKHOUSE BOOK PUBLICATIONS LLC
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
espiritcreations.com
Espirit Creations & Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
kp-pub.com
KP Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
cambridgescholars.com
Cambridge Scholars Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
batterseapublishing.com
Battersea Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
reveriepublishers.com
Reverie Publishers |
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
macmillan.com
Macmillan Science and Education and Macmillan Publishers
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
riley-hunt.com
Riley Hunt Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
oceanpublisher.com
Home | Ocean Publisher
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
eudaimoniapublishing.com
Eudaimonia Publishing -
2 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.