similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to suturepress.com

Suture Press | Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

anapurnapress.com

Anapurna Press - Home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

annapurnapress.com

Anapurna Press - Home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

canalsidepress.com

Canalside Press

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Iska Press | African Literature Publisher in the U.S.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Iska Press | African Literature Publisher in the U.S.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anchorlinebooks.com

Anchorline Press

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

bearlodgewriters.com

Bearlodge Writers | Home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

A margine – scritture provvisorie

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

itlpress | in the light press

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

camphorpress.com

Camphor Press | Publisher of East Asia Books

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Hema Devare | Home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Pontcanna Press UK

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Moiré Press — Speculative Culture

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kindred Press | Custom Books & Prints

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

antoncebalo.com

Anton Cebalo | home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

oanhandonly.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.