Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to susannahalene.com

Soos - Industrial Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
ghikhan.com
Ghikhan, Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
80match
sharonraviv.com
Sharon Raviv, Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
80match
ivanlisi.com
Ivan Lisi | industrial designer
1 shared topicsdesign
80match
6floral.com
Sky Cheng — Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
cameronholder.com
Cameron Holder • Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
henryjulier.com
Henry Julier Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
shibilmani.com
Industrial & Graphic Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
cademoon.com
Cade Moon Industrial Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
gaurdesign.com
Gaur Design | Industrial Designer | Mumbai
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
object-office.com
Object–Office | Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
richardsapperdesign.com
Richard Sapper - Official website of industrial designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
isisshiffer.com
Spitfire Industry - Industrial Design | New York
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
rezaghanadan.com
Reza Ghanadan — Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
2simmons.com
2 Simmons - Organic Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
ghavamidesign.com
Ghavami Design | Industrial Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
suoodogier.com
Suood Ogier — Industrial Designer & Maker
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
estevanquintanilla.com
Estevan Quintanilla (Industrial Designer)
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
et-cor.com
COR | Visual, Physical & Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.