similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to susacapo.com

Susan Gunn – Enough Rope · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

nadinenettmann.com

NadineNettmann – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Amy Sumida – When normal love just isn't enough

2 shared topicsfiction

texiesusangregory.com

Author Texie Susan Gregory

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

BdR > Susan Maxwell

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

DEWEYFINN – STICK IT TO DA MAN

2 shared topicsfiction

A.M. Tyson – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kim Magowan – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kit Scriven – Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Rena Gardin – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Terri Nolan – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

ashlenbrown.com

Ashlen Brown – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

derekgorman.com

Derek Gorman – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

annhilbornwriter.com

Ann Hilborn – MY WORKS

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

paulagleeson.com

Paula Gleeson – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

awmccollough.com

A. W. McCollough – Speculative Fiction

2 shared topicsfiction

amymasondoan.com

Amy Mason Doan – Writer

2 shared topicsfiction

andreahairston.com

Andrea Hairston – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

angelajameson.com

Angela Jameson – Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.