Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to surveycoder.de

SurveyCoder · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
61match
planecode.de 🇩🇪
plaincode - app development + tech blog
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
plaincode.de 🇩🇪
plaincode - app development + tech blog
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
asgalon.net
asgalon.net Software Entwicklung, Coremedia, DevOps
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
rock-the-prototype.com
Rock the Prototype - Softwareentwicklung & Prototyping
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
softwareentwicklerin.com
Home :: Softwareentwicklerin
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
softwareundmenschen.com
Marcel Koch | Software, Menschen, Lösungen
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
pepys-projekt.de 🇩🇪
Das Pepys-Projekt » Maintenance Mode
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
pro-recycling.de 🇩🇪
Philip Schöttler - Software Engineer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
rapidbase.de 🇩🇪
RapidBase.de :: das RapidWeaver Info-Portal
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
reytech.de 🇩🇪
Reytech Engineering & Development
3 shared topicsweb-development
60match
skynet-computers.de 🇩🇪
Login
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
60match
sneakscore.de 🇩🇪
Login
3 shared topicsweb-development
44match
code-box.app
Code-Box
2 shared topicsweb-development
44match
snowcode.de 🇩🇪
SnowCode
2 shared topicsweb-development
43match
codelab-one.com
codelab.one
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
43match
smartcodelabs.de 🇩🇪
SmartCodeLabs
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
42match
sp-codes.de 🇩🇪
sp-codes - Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
42match
passioncode.de 🇩🇪
Passioncode GmbH
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.