Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to superdeclarative.com

SuperDeclarative! · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
dkotama.com
I Nyoman Darma Kotama Blog | A blog about web development, programming, and technology.
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
hellosohag.com
Sohag's Blog
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
marciadrucker.com
Marcia J. Drucker - Home
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
superkenil.com
Super Kenil (Kenil Sudani)
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
molliboyle.com
All posts | Dev Blog
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
shaneelliott.com
Shane Elliott
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
kodezio.com
Kodezio | Code, Architecture & Craft
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
superpowerplanet.com
Super Power Planet
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
makariev.com
Dimitar Makariev - Java consultant
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gavinpicard.com
Gavin Picard
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
isenkasa.com
Isen Kasa
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
mackenziesoftware.com
MacKenzie Software
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
shanerodrigues.com
Shane Rodrigues - Personal Website
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
angelreh.com
Ángel René Herrera Calzada - ICT Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
marconis.dev
Developer Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
annasobolewska.com
Anna Sobolewska
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
dilanxd.com
Dilan Nair
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
manjunathgajula.com
Manjunath Gajula | Senior Java Developer Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.