Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to studioph1.de

Database Error · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
pc-database.de 🇩🇪
PC-Database
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
preventnetwork-database.de 🇩🇪
NetEditing - Database Management
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
aspicon.cloud
ASPICON Database Technology and Service - Startseite
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
aspicon.info
ASPICON Database Technology and Service - Startseite
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
aspicon.net
ASPICON Database Technology and Service - Startseite
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
aspicon.org
ASPICON Database Technology and Service - Startseite
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
partout-media.de 🇩🇪
Willkommen bei PARTOUT® Database Multimedia System
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
pipperr.de 🇩🇪
GPI Consult - Gunther Pippèrr - Oracle Database Full Stack Developer & AI Enterprise Architekt
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
software-maker.net
Data Analytics
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
opendatazensus.de 🇩🇪
Open Data Zensus
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
opendata-duisburg.de 🇩🇪
Open Data Duisburg
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
krake.dev
Open Data Aggregator
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
offenedatenduesseldorf.de 🇩🇪
Open Data Düsseldorf
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
pool-media-muc.de 🇩🇪
THW-Pegel - Opendata API
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
opendata-hro.de 🇩🇪
Willkommen - OpenData.HRO
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
open-data-kommunal.de 🇩🇪
Kommunaler Fahrplan Open Data
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
politischeoekonomie.de 🇩🇪
Talk Data To Me / Sven Jarmer
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
politischeoekonomik.de 🇩🇪
Talk Data To Me / Sven Jarmer
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.