similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to strojer.com

Strojer alternatives & similar sites

Mikkel Strøjer — Creative & Strategic Brand Marketer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Marketing And Advertising →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
trigger7.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	TRIGGER 7 \| CREATIVE AND STRATEGIC BRAND MARKETING	en	marketing-and-advertising Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trigger-7.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	TRIGGER 7 \| CREATIVE AND STRATEGIC BRAND MARKETING	en	marketing-and-advertising Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hidiana.me ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Diana Regal – Brand Marketing and Creative Strategy	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
charlescavalcanti.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Charles Cavalcanti — Global Marketer & Creative Strategist	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 8
stully.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Andrew Stull — Creative Director & Brand Strategist	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamfabian.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Fabian Folias — Creative Visionary: Strategist, Designer, Communicator, and Marketer	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ian-carey.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Ian Carey – Creative story-teller and Brand Marketer	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stratebeeagency.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	StrateBee \| Brand Marketing Storyteller Strategists	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
travisgrantlee.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Travis Lee \| Marketing Strategist & Creative Director	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
youssefhajjar.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Youssef Hajjar — Brand & Marketing Strategist	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abrahamcovo.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Abraham Covo — AI & Creative Strategy · Digital Marketing	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cjroberts.me ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	CJ Roberts – Marketing Director & Creative Strategist	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stratagon.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Stratagon: Strategic Marketing, Technology, and Creative Agency	en	marketing-and-advertising HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zachglass.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Zach Glass — Brand & Creative Executive	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clavestudio.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Clave Studio — Creative & Marketing Agency	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5peaksdigital.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	5 Peaks Digital — Strategic Digital Marketing & Creative Studio	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ideolabinfo.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Strategic Marketer	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
strategicmarketer.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Strategic Marketer	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.