similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to stonegate-ou.com

Stonegate Ou alternatives & similar sites

Stonegate — Engineering Digital Systems at Scale — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
subbclub.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	RATSIOSERVIS, TOO — Engineering reliable digital systems	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7layers.software ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	7layers Software — Engineering Digital Solutions for Africa, Built for the World	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
kyobix.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Kyobix — Engineering the Digital Bridge	KR~ en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotcreateph.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	DOTCREATE - Digital Systems That Power Growth	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ideasforest.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Ideas Forest - Engineering Intelligent Systems for Businesses That Scale	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rkinnovate.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	RK Innovate - Product Engineering Studio	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rm-software.net ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	RM SOFTWARE \| iOS Engineering & Digital Solutions	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robbiesoft.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	RobbieSoft \| Engineering Digital Solutions	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
futura-research.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Futura Research \| Custom Software Systems & Product Engineering	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
substratesystems.io ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Substrate — Foundational Systems	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doorsnext.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	SmarterProcess - Software and Systems Engineering	en	software-and-applications Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
traitit.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	TraitIT \| Software Engineering & Digital Transformation Partner	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
futureline.ai ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	FutureLine — Systems Built for Scale \| Digital Transformation & Custom Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
charnwoodsystems.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Systems Consulting and Software Engineering \| Charnwood Systems	AU~ en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
charnwoodsystems.io ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Systems Consulting and Software Engineering \| Charnwood Systems	AU~ en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rnj-software.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Software Engineering & Consulting — RnJ Software	US~ en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mirkuztechnologies.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mirkuz Technologies — Engineering the Future	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stoneorca.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Stone Orca LLC -Mission-Critical Software Engineering	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.