similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to stedca.com

Stedca alternatives & similar sites

Science, Technology, and Education Care (STEDCA) – You write, We publish — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
csr-bd.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Centre for Social Research-CSR – Bridging Science, Technology, and the Social Fabric	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vivamui.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Vivamui - Products for Science, Education and STEM	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
evolvingearth.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Evolving Earth Foundation – Supporting Earth Science Research and Education	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
custom-clarity.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Custom Clarity, LLC – Medical, Science, and Technical Writing	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
virgilrerimassie.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Virgil Rerimassie – Virgil Rerimassie Science, Technology & Society Researcher and Groove Guitarist	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anthonyariza.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Anthony Ariza – Bridging neuroscience research and higher education.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antivibrationtable.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Anti Vibration Technologies	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katiegracecarpenter.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Katie Grace Carpenter – Science journalist. Writer. Educator.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omnimagazine.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Omni Magazine – Science, Imagination, and the Future	en	science WordPress Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielapfabigan.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Daniela M. Pfabigan – Neuroscience, Psychology, University	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lab-tools.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Lab Tools : Nano-Science, Nano-Metrology and Scientific Instrumentation and Software Design.	United Kingdom en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curianic.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	CURIANIC – Where Science, Life, and Discovery Meet	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anr-technologies.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ANR Technologies - Freeing Scientists to Focus on Science	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
expsci.tech ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ExpSci - Experience Science Better \| Revolutionary STEM Education Tools	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danidanisolakian.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Dani Solakian – Software engineer and science communicator showcasing projects, technical writing, and research work.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
etrg.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ETRG.ORG \| Engineering and Technology Research Group	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amse.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	American Museum of Science and Energy – Inspire the Imagination	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
vizsi.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	VISUALIZE YOUR SCIENCE – TIPS, TRICKS, and TUTORIALS	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.