similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to starmud.com

Starmud alternatives & similar sites

StarMUD: The Next Generation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
biota.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	BIOTA – The New Science of Life's Origins	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naturalscience.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	The World Foundation for Natural Science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
attheroots.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	At the Roots – At the Roots	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
asthelabturns.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	A daily blog about life in the lab.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cytophys.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Physical Properties of the Cytoplasm	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
esa-ecophys.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Physiological Ecology Section of the Ecological Society of America	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neants.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	A Field Guide to the Ants of New England – Sound Solutions for Sustainable Science	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icems.eu ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	:: International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety ::	European Union en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erinelizkane.net ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Erin E. Kane, PhD – team science and collaboration – primate socioecology and morphology	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neocalculators.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Neo Calulators - Precision Tools for Everyday Calculations	en	science WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cushmanfoundation.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home - Cushman Foundation (Allen Press / Knowledge Works Global)	en	biological-sciences Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cvsea.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	CVSEA - Canadian Vietnamese Scientists & Experts Association	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myicyphd.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Emelia J. Chamberlain – biological oceanography of the poles	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100islandchallenge.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	100 Island Challenge \| Understanding the World's Coral Reefs	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlantaforty.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Atlanta 40 \| Interactive Conservation Project by Science ATL	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ericlwalters.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Welcome to the Walters Lab Research Group - Eric L Walters, PhD	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ericlwalters.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Welcome to the Walters Lab Research Group - Eric L Walters, PhD	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naturalorganization.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Natural Organization Institute \| Protein Sequence Organization Research	United States~ en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.