similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to staplescience.com

Staplescience alternatives & similar sites

Science Tracking Across the Project LifEspan – STAPLE — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
olympiadspark.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Science Project Engineer - Organize & Submit Your Research	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datle.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Retraction Watch – Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7greatmysteries.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	7 Great Mysteries – What Science Teaches Us About Life	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dostv.ph ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	DOSTv: Science For The People	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buildconservices.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Buildcon – Laboratory & Science Research WordPress Theme	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
csstlightningfires.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	CSST LIGHTNING FIRES! – Do you trust the science?	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
earthriseproject.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	earthrise Project – Inspiring Young Minds to Action Through Art, Science, and Sustainability	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danidanisolakian.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dani Solakian – Software engineer and science communicator showcasing projects, technical writing, and research work.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omoriyumi.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Omori Yumi – Science is a way of thinking.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cameronneylon.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Science in the Open – The online home of Cameron Neylon	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ersa.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ERSA – The Home of Regional Science in Europe	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
darafarhadi.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dara Farhadi – Science Storyteller	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
meganewald.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Megan Ewald – Science changes the world when people understand it.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
escapingthebench.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Escaping The Bench – Science-Based Media by Jenna E Gallegos	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eo4cerealstress.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	EO4CerealStress – Project funded by ESA	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 2
datainscience.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Data In Science Technologies \| Making sense of the world’s data	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omnimagazine.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Omni Magazine – Science, Imagination, and the Future	en	science WordPress Reaction Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cysf.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Calgary Youth Science Fair – Leading young minds into the future	en	science Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.