similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to stanleysim.com

Stanleysim alternatives & similar sites

Stanley Sim – Supporting learning with technology — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
fenniak.net ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Mathieu Fenniak \| Constantly learning new technology.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mechadarwin.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Mechadarwin – My evolving relationship with technology and art	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dansuthers.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	dansuthers \| Occasional thoughts on technology, learning and life.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
animexplusradio.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Information - $ Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
esharp.net ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	ESHARP.NET – Technology and life with Eyvonne Sharp	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kennaatech.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	KENNAA TECH – Bringing Ideas to Life with Creativity and Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
techtutorial.co.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Tech Tutorial – Technology and news	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
anibytes.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	anibytes.com - Bytes of Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
remixf.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Remix Fusion - Technology Blog	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2fatdads.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	2FatDads – A Clearly Canadian Technology DadCast	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bridgetechtraining.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home - Bridge Technology Training	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bristersoftware.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Brister Techtalk - Keeping track of changing technology!	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
data-things.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Data Things – Tangible Engagements with Data and Technologies	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dantasfiles.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Daniel @ Dantas Files \| Technology in NJ	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vkontech.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Vasil Kosturski - On Software & Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dougalexander.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Doug Alexander – Writing about technology, privacy, and the open web	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
friendlytechhelp.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Friendly Tech Help – Friendly help with technology- get it here!	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
desktek.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Home	en	technology-and-computing Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.