Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to standop.com

Architekturbüro Gerhard Standop, Willkommen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
boegemann.com
Architekturbüro H. Bögemann
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
proarch-dd.de 🇩🇪
Architekturbuero Jana Probst
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
maurer-architekten.com
Maurer Architekten - Architekturbüro aus München
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
maurerandpartners.com
Maurer Architekten - Architekturbüro aus München
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
realarchitektur.de 🇩🇪
Realarchitektur
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
angelis-partner.com
ANGELIS & PARTNER | Architekturbüro Oldenburg
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
siemonsenarchitektur.de 🇩🇪
Siemonsenarchitektur
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
fastarch.com
Fastarch – Architekturbüro eth/sia
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
ars-vincit.com
Architektur | Ars Vincit
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
3d-architekten.com
3D Architekten – Architekturbüro Kronach
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
farukmurat.com
Studio FM – Architekturstudio Faruk Murat
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
acribia.net
acribia | ARCHITEKTUR & DESIGN
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
bielenberg-architekten.com
Planungsbüro für Architektur + Städtebau - BIELENBERG ARCHITEKTEN
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
familie-lenz.com
maier.lenz |ARCHITEKTUR|
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
thematerialconcierge.com
Material Concierge — Materialbibliothek für Schweizer Architekturbüros
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
prock-architektur.de 🇩🇪
Büro Prock und Thumann, Architektur, TGA, Landshut, Essenbach
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
adg-dresden.org
ADG Architektur + Design Gebhardt - STARTSEITE
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
riedl-architektur.com
Riedl Architektur
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.