similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to standardresources.com

Standardresources alternatives & similar sites

Standard Resources: people deserve more — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
activmobs.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ActivMob \| Engaging with people and connecting them to resources through activity	United Kingdom en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
provabd.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	People’s Resource Oriented Voluntary Association – PROVA	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mysaboard.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Resources for Salvation Army Boards	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
investinghope.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Investing Hope – Hope Resource Center	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hospicegriefresources.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Preserve Their Voice	en	non-profit-organizations Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cpafrica.org.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CPA – Love People – Love Life	United Kingdom en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100people-silverfalls.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Silver Falls 100 People Who Care	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abbeypeople.org.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - Abbey People	United Kingdom en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csogffhub.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Civil Society GFF Resource and Engagement Hub	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equalxsfoundation.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	EqualXs - Equal Access to Resources and Opportunities for All	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2spirits.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	2-Spirited People of the 1st Nations	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctcdonate.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CTC Causes \| Helping People Thru Change	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atmanirbhara.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Pilani Atmanirbhar Resource Center (PARC) \| Bits Pilani	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atmanirbhar.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Pilani Atmanirbhar Resource Center (PARC) \| Bits Pilani	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100womenwr.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	100+ Women Who Care: Western Reserve - Home	en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ei-prajanma.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Healing Earth By Loving People - Ei Prajanma	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ncgroup.eu ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - NC Group - A People Helping People Group	European Union en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
auamo.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	'Auamo Portal Beta – A resource supporting thriving communities	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.