similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to squirrelsec.com

Squirrelsec alternatives & similar sites

Squirrel Security | Experter inom Pentesting & Cybersäkerhet — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cybersakerhetslagen.nu ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Cybersäkerhetslagen & NIS2 \| Preliminär bedömning	sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyberhygien.nu ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	JOIN THE DIGITAL TRUST HUB \| OneMore Secure	sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ineratest.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Identifieringstjänst SITHS - Inera	sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bakgrundskontroll.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Jämför Bakgrundskontroller i Sverige 2025 \| Bakgrundskontroll fakta	Sweden~ sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bakgrundskontroll.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Jämför Bakgrundskontroller i Sverige 2025 \| Bakgrundskontroll fakta	Sweden~ sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bakgrundskontrollfakta.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Jämför Bakgrundskontroller i Sverige 2025 \| Bakgrundskontroll fakta	Sweden~ sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antivirusguiden.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Antivirus guiden	sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
24sju.tech ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	24Sju	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dataministeriet.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Dataministeriet – A podcast about data protection and privacy	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotkeeper.biz ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeeper.info ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeeper.net ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dotkeeper.org ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	Dotkeeper - Professionell Domänhantering och Varumärkesskydd	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cryvanta.io ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Cryvanta — Custom System Builds (and pentest on top)	sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
8-grid.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	8-GRID IT Consulting & Services GmbH	sv	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meaplus.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Start - Meaplus	sv	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sponcero.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Sponcero \| IT-Konsult & Webbutveckling	sv	it-and-internet-support	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heddata.net ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Heddata, din lokala serviceverkstad och datorbutik i centrala Älvdalen	sv	it-and-internet-support WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.